We have an unprecedented opportunity to look beyond responding to the here and now, and to reimagine the future of transport in the UK. The national response to the coronavirus pandemic has pressed Ctrl/Alt/Delete on our travel behaviour. So what happens next?
Friday, 22 May, 2020
All Entran offices have been closed since 19th March 2020 but we have ensured complete business continuity, enabling staff to work from home with full access to their normal IT resources and project files. We have now put measures in place to allow the Bristol office to open from 1st June 2020. We will continue to monitor Government advice and some staff will continue to work from home for the foreseeable future. Thank you and stay safe!
Thursday, 21 May, 2020
Entran operates across three offices and all of our staff regularly work from home either full or part-tim as part of our normal working practices. In light of the evolving coronavirus situation, we would therefore like to reassure our clients and partners that we have procedures in place to enable full business continuity.
Tuesday, 12 May, 2020
Today, Rob Williams and Richard Fitter returned to the University of Bath for a third year to deliver a lecture on Transport Planning to the BEng and MEng Civil Engineering students. This time we were accompanied by Lucy who is completing her year in industry with Entran having been one of the audience last time round.
Tuesday, 03 March, 2020
London Councils, the umbrella body for local government in the capital, is launching a new online resource to support borough collaboration on car clubs policy and will host the resource on its website. It will be used by borough officers, car club operators and other users to access relevant sources of information.
Thursday, 20 February, 2020
Very frustrating planning decision in Essex this week. Our client's planning application for 200+ new homes was refused against officer recommendation. The planning and highway authorities both supported the development and a package of highway improvements had been negotiated and agreed with the the local highway authority. On the night, however, one Councillor stated his objection by mis-quoting the commitee report. He was corrected by officers; however, that was sufficient for the vote to go against the development. One reason for refusal was that the cumulative transport effect of this and a neighbouring development would be 'severe', despite that being a specific component of the approved Transport Assessment.
Wednesday, 19 February, 2020